4.5 Editorial Material

Agri-investment scholars of the world unite! The finance-driven land rush as boundary object

Journal

DIALOGUES IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 173-176

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/20438206211069711

Keywords

Agrarian transformations; Aotearoa New Zealand; assetization; financialization; global finance; global land rush; institutional investors; investment chains; operations of capital; Tanzania

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [363300598]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This response addresses the issues raised in the commentaries on my book and calls for a comprehensive approach towards agri-investments. It engages with questions of institutional investibility, the dimensions of institutional landscapes, ownership, and the challenge of providing a global historical outlook while offering situated accounts. The article also explores comparativism, methodology, and the political implications of an opening-the-black box approach.
This response addresses several of the issues raised by the commentaries on my book Farming as Financial Asset - Global Finance and the Making of Institutional Landscapes (2020). Reflecting upon the intentions and limitations of the book, it makes a call for treating agri-investments to which scholars contribute from different geographical, theoretical, and methodological angles. In detail, it engages with the question of how farmland investments relate to other 'asset classes' in terms of the practical (and political) problem of institutional investibility, the material and human dimensions of institutional landscapes, the ownership question, as well as the challenge to write a book that has a global historical outlook and offers situated accounts at the same time. It also engages with questions of comparativism, methodology, and the political implications of an opening-the-black box approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available