3.9 Review

BIM applications in sustainable construction: scientometric and state-of-the-art review

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 1969-1981

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2029679

Keywords

BIM; sustainability; scientometric; thematic analysis; sustainable construction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the application of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in sustainable construction through scientometric analysis, identifying research confusion, neglect, and application gaps in the field. It provides a deep understanding of BIM in sustainability and suggests future research directions.
The construction sector is notorious for being unsustainable and disintegrated industry while, it is crucial to provide a lens towards sustainable construction from the digital innovation and integration perspective. Although a considerable amount of research has been focused on how building information modeling (BIM) helps improve sustainable construction; there are still a limited number of studies that have investigated the BIM process in sustainability fields. This study aims to identify all common domains of BIM and sustainability applications and reveals the academic and practice gaps in the construction industry. Through employing the scientometric analysis method, a collective number of 188 journal articles were gathered and analyzed. The thematic analysis was then applied and five common domains of BIM and sustainability on lifecycle assessment, green buildings criteria, energy analysis, environmental assessments and design, construction and project management were eventually identified. The current study identifies the research confusion, neglect and application gaps across all five identified domains and provides researchers with a deep understanding of BIM in the sustainability and future directions for further research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available