Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 56-68Publisher
WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/eet.1963
Keywords
analytical framework; climate governance; decision-making; multi-level governance; polycentric governance
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The governance of climate mitigation and adaptation has been discussed from both polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives. These perspectives are closely related but have distinct differences in some aspects, as one has evolved from empirical research within the United States and the other within the European Union. It is necessary to bring these two discourses together within the increasingly global discourse on climate governance.
Governance of climate mitigation and adaptation has been discussed within polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives. Both perspectives on climate governance are intimately related but yet in some regards are distinctly different - as one perspective has evolved from empirical research within the United States and the other in the European Union. Within an increasingly global discourse on climate governance, there is a need in the literature to bring both discourses together. The findings are based on a systematic literature review of 42 climate governance papers published since 2000. This paper discusses how multi-level and polycentric climate governance perspectives converge and diverge along five dimensions. The five dimensions provide insights for applying a multi-level or polycentric governance perspective to empirical research.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available