Journal
SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIETY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 69-93Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1474746421000786
Keywords
Human rights; aged care; nursing homes; free market
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The market-driven Australian aged care system has failed to meet the aims of providing residents with greater choice and higher quality services due to asymmetries of knowledge and power. A human rights framework supported by responsive regulation is proposed as a solution for improving the aged care system.
The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety has again focussed attention on the failings of the Australian aged care system. Residential aged care in Australia has become increasingly market-driven since the major reforms of 1997. The aims of increased marketisation include providing residents with greater choice, higher quality services, and increasing providers' efficiency and innovation. However, marketisation is not meeting these aims, predominantly due to asymmetries of knowledge and power between residents and aged care providers. These asymmetries arise from inadequate provision of information, geographic disparities, urgency for care as needs arise acutely, and issues surrounding safety, including cultural safety. We propose a human rights framework, supported by responsive regulation, to overcome the failings of the current system and deliver an improved aged care system which is fit for purpose.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available