Unpacking context in realist evaluations: Findings from a comprehensive review

Realist evaluation is an established approach in evaluation. The main question driving realist evaluation is to uncover how, for whom, and under what conditions an intervention works. This is accomplished by empirically examining the inner mechanisms by which an intervention generates outcomes within a particular context-explicating the underlying context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Despite the central role of context in realist evaluation, systematic knowledge about how context is conceptualized and applied in realist evaluation is limited. Informed by the findings of a comprehensive review, the aim of this article is to unpack how context is conceptualized in realist evaluations, the types of contextual factors examined as part of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, and the methodological challenges experienced by evaluators when examining these in realist evaluations. The article concludes with a discussion of conceptual and practical developments for future applications of realist evaluations.

Automated summary

Realist evaluation is an established approach that aims to uncover how interventions work, for whom, and under what conditions. It focuses on the relationships between context, mechanism, and outcome, but evaluators often encounter methodological challenges in practice. Future applications of realist evaluations will benefit from continued conceptual and practical developments.