4.3 Article

A Bayesian approach to calibrate system dynamics models using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Journal

SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 283-309

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sdr.1693

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [SFI/12/RC/2289_P2]
  2. European Regional Development Fund
  3. European Union [883285]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Model calibration is a crucial test for dynamic hypotheses, where a Bayesian perspective is used for parameter inference. The efficient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm is introduced to explore complex parameter spaces and calibrate an SEIR model within a practical workflow. Visualisation tools are recommended to facilitate result communication.
Model calibration is an essential test that dynamic hypotheses must pass in order to serve as tools for decision-making. In short, it is the search for a match between actual and simulated behaviours using parameter inference. Here, we approach such an inference process from a Bayesian perspective. Under this paradigm, we provide statements about the parameters (viewed as random variables) and data in probabilistic terms. These statements stem from a posterior distribution whose solution is often found via statistical simulation. However, the uptake of these methods within the system dynamics field has been somewhat limited, and state-of-the-art algorithms have not been explored. Therefore, we introduce Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), an efficient algorithm that outperforms random-walk methods in exploring complex parameter spaces. We apply HMC to calibrate an SEIR model and frame the process within a practical workflow. In doing so, we also recommend visualisation tools that facilitate the communication of results. (c) 2021 The Authors. System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available