4.2 Article

Racial Bias Correlates with States Having Fewer Health Professional Shortage Areas and Fewer Federally Qualified Community Health Center Sites

Journal

JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 325-333

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40615-021-01223-0

Keywords

African Americans; Racial bias; Healthcare disparities; Poverty policy; Federally Qualified Health Centers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that greater racial bias is associated with fewer FQHC delivery sites and fewer HPSA designations at the state level. This bias leads to neglect in identifying and providing healthcare services for African Americans and other low-income individuals.
Federally Qualified Community Health Centers (FQHCs), serving Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), are fixtures of the healthcare safety net and are central to healthcare delivery for African Americans and other marginalized Americans. Anti-African American bias, tied to anti- welfare sentiment and to a belief in African Americans' supposed safety net dependency, can suppress states' willingness to identify HPSAs and to apply for and operate FQHCs. Drawing on data from n = 1,084,553 non-Hispanic White Project Implicit respondents from 2013-2018, we investigated associations between state-level implicit and explicit racial bias and availability of FQHCs and with HPSA designations. After controlling for states' sociopolitical conservatism, wealth, health status, and acceptance of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, greater racial bias was correlated with fewer FQHC delivery sites and fewer HPSA designations. White's bias against African Americans is associated with fewer FQHC opportunities for care and fewer identifications of treatment need for African Americans and other low-income people lacking healthcare options, reflecting bias-influenced neglect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available