The intersection of autism and gender in the negotiation of identity: A systematic review and metasynthesis

Influenced by theories of intersectionality, performativity and gender hegemony, this review sought to explore the intersection of autism and gender in qualitative research into autistic identity. Twelve papers were subjected to a thematic metasynthesis following a systematic search. Study participants were predominantly cisgender female or gender-diverse: perspectives of cisgender autistic males were lacking. The three superordinate themes developed related to: (1) the ways in which autism discourses restricted gender identities, through the influence of the extreme male brain and masking narratives and the use of autism to explain gender non-conformity and gender diversity; (2) the ways in which gendered autistic identities were positioned within social power hierarchies as othered, subordinate and less acceptable ways of being; and (3) possibilities for finding spaces of belonging and resistance. While autism as an identity may offer community and freedom from normative expectations, dominant autism discourses act to restrict and police gender, reinforcing existing power hierarchies. We encourage practitioners to reflect on the clinical, ethical and political implications of their positioning in relation to the constructs of autism and gender, and to explore alongside people seeking support the personal and political impacts of gendered autism discourses.

Automated summary

This review explores the intersection of autism and gender in qualitative research, finding that autism discourses restrict gender identities and position gendered autistic identities in subordinate and othered ways. While autism as an identity may offer community and freedom, dominant autism discourses act to restrict and police gender, reinforcing existing power hierarchies.