Journal
RESEARCH EVALUATION
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 470-483Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvab032
Keywords
'predatory' publishing; research evaluation; higher education; publication ethics
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The intensified pressure to publish has led to the proliferation of pseudo scholarly publications, with scholars needing to publish more research quickly. Research studies have found that 'predatory' articles are authored by scholars from diverse fields and levels of experience, and geographical location and author experience fail to fully explain the profile of these articles.
Intensified pressure to publish is a hallmark of a rapidly evolving higher education field where the faculty of any hue cannot avoid the 'publish or perish' treadmill. Growing need to publish more and to do so fast have resulted in the proliferation of pseudo scholarly publications many regards as 'predatory'. This article provides a systematic review of research studies on so-called 'predatory' publishing, a new but fast-growing area of research, with a particular focus on the awareness of prospective authors about so-called 'predatory' publishing, the profile of authors publishing in 'predatory' journals and the causal factors encouraging authors to publish in such outlets. It synthetizes the results of research studies on the topic to identify gaps and trends in the existing knowledgebase to guide further research. Results indicate so-called 'predatory' articles are authored by scholars from all fields and levels of academic experience rather than by inexperienced scholars only and 'predatory' contributions are not limited to developing countries, suggesting geographical location and author experience fail to explain the author profile of 'predatory' articles. Findings of this review suggest causal factors include research evaluation policies and publication pressure that emerge from the research environment in which scholars operate authors' limited capacity to publish in 'legitimate' journals and conventions of so-called 'predatory' publishers. This indicates meaningful action might address all these factors in combination, rather than focus on them in isolation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available