3.8 Article

Cardiovascular efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages 585-592

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i10.585

Keywords

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors; Cardiovascular outcomes; Atrial fibrillation; Atrial flutter; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pooling data from 6 trials including 52520 T2DM patients, DPP-4 inhibitors do not appear to provide significant cardiovascular benefits and do not pose a significant risk for major cardiac arrhythmias, except for atrial flutter.
BACKGROUND Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a generally safe and well tolerated antidiabetic drug class with proven efficacy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently, a series of large, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing cardiovascular outcomes with DPP-4 inhibitors have been published. AIM To pool data from the aforementioned trials concerning the impact of DPP-4 inhibitors on surrogate cardiovascular efficacy outcomes and on major cardiac arrhythmias. METHODS We searched PubMed and grey literature sources for all published RCTs assessing cardiovascular outcomes with DPP-4 inhibitors compared to placebo until October 2020. We extracted data concerning the following hard efficacy outcomes: fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal and non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for coronary revascularization and cardiovascular death. We also extracted data regarding the risk for major cardiac arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. RESULTS We pooled data from 6 trials in a total of 52520 patients with T2DM assigned either to DPP-4 inhibitor or placebo. DPP-4 inhibitors compared to placebo led to a non-significant increase in the risk for fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction [risk ratio (RR) = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.94-1.11, I-2 = 0%], hospitalization for heart failure (RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.92-1.29, I-2 = 65%) and cardiovascular death (RR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.93-1.11, I-2 = 0%). DPP-4 inhibitors resulted in a non-significant decrease in the risk for fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.85-1.08, I-2 = 0%) and coronary revascularization (RR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.90-1.09, I-2 = 0%), Finally, DPP-4 inhibitors demonstrated a neutral effect on the risk for hospitalization due to unstable angina (RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.85-1.18, I-2 = 0%). As far as cardiac arrhythmias are concerned, DPP-4 inhibitors did not significantly affect the risk for atrial fibrillation (RR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.78-1.17, I-2 = 0%), while they were associated with a significant increase in the risk for atrial flutter, equal to 52% (RR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.03-2.24, I-2 = 0%). DPP-4 inhibitors did not have a significant impact on the risk for any of the rest assessed cardiac arrhythmias. CONCLUSION DPP-4 inhibitors do not seem to confer any significant cardiovascular benefit for patients with T2DM, while they do not seem to be associated with a significant risk for any major cardiac arrhythmias, except for atrial flutter. Therefore, this drug class should not be the treatment of choice for patients with established cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors, except for those cases when newer antidiabetics (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors) are not tolerated, contraindicated or not affordable for the patient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available