4.5 Article

Coordination through revenue sharing contract in an E-commerce supply chain with consumer preference

Journal

MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 2467-2479

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/mde.3538

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2021JM-146]
  2. Foundation for Jiangsu key Laboratory of Traffic and Transportation Security [TTS2018-02]
  3. Beijing Intelligent Logistics System Collaborative Innovation Center [BILSCIC-2019KF-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the decision-making and coordination of an e-commerce supply chain (ECSC) with consumer preferences. The optimal decisions are made for decentralized and centralized decision models, and a comparative analysis is performed. A coordination mechanism based on revenue sharing is proposed, and the conclusions are verified through numerical analysis.
The decision-making and coordination of an e-commerce supply chain (ECSC) with consumer preferences are studied. In this paper, the ECSC, consisting of a single manufacturer and a single e-commerce platform, is considered, and the optimal decisions are made for two scenarios, namely, decentralized and centralized decision models. Then, a comparative analysis is performed for two models. The coordination mechanism of revenue sharing is proposed based on the decentralization, and finally, a numerical analysis is used to verify the conclusions. The theoretical results show that the e-commerce platform is less profitable than the manufacturer because of its economies of scale. Interestingly, the quality of e-commerce services under decentralized decision is instead the highest, and improving the service level of e-commerce does not always benefit e-commerce platforms. Meanwhile, a revenue sharing contract will reduce the price and profit gap between the manufacturer and the e-commerce platform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available