4.2 Article

Wheelchair-mounted robotic arms: a survey of occupational therapists' practices and perspectives

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 1421-1430

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2021.2017030

Keywords

Wheelchair-mounted robotic arms; robotics; assistive technology; occupational therapy; perspectives; barriers; survey

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the current practices and perspectives of occupational therapists regarding wheelchair-mounted robotic arms (WMRAs). The survey found that health professionals need easier access to funding, formal training, and resources to support their involvement with WMRAs.
Purpose Despite the benefits of wheelchair-mounted robotic arms (WMRAs), occupational therapists are not yet widely involved in the recommendation or implementation of these assistive devices. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the current practices and perspectives of occupational therapists who had and had not recommended a WMRA on the recommendation, training, and implementation of WMRAs. Methods This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. An online survey was sent to Canadian, European, and American occupational therapists who had or had not worked with WMRAs. Respondents were asked close-ended questions about their experience, role, barriers, motivations, and future needs regarding WMRAs. We compared results between respondents who had and had not recommended WMRAs using descriptive statistics. Results Ninety-three North American and European occupational therapists completed the survey. Of those, 29 (31.2%) had recommended a WMRA, mostly the JACO robotic arm (n = 26, 89.7%) in rehabilitation centres (n = 18, 62.1%). Their perspectives on their role and barriers related to WMRAs were similar to those who had never recommended a WMRA. All respondents recognised the relevance of occupational therapists' contribution, and most reported interest in WMRAs (n = 76, 81.7%). However, many barriers emerged, mainly related to limited funding (n = 49, 76.6%), lack of training and knowledge (n = 38, 59.4%), and resource constraints (n = 37, 54.4%). Future needs identified matched these barriers. Conclusion This survey provides novel insight into occupational therapists' perspectives on WMRAs. It highlights that health professionals need to have easier access to funding, formal training, and resources to support their involvement with WMRAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available