4.6 Article

Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China

Journal

STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 51-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.005

Keywords

Tax incentives; Total factor productivity; Technological progress; Porter hypothesis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71633006, 71673304, 71874207, 71373283]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that tax incentives for green development can improve mining companies' total factor productivity, with a more significant impact on private companies and companies in central and western China. There is a two-way causal relationship between tax incentives and TFP, and tax incentives improve TFP through technological progress.
Based on unique micro-level data on 18,885 Chinese mining companies, this study explores the effect of tax incentives for green development on mining company total factor productivity (TFP) and its mech-anism of influence. The results are as follows. (1) Tax incentives for green development can improve mining companies' TFP. A 1% increase in tax incentives for mining companies increases TFP by 0.060%. After considering endogeneity and selection bias, our conclusion is still valid. (2) Heterogeneity analysis shows that the positive effect of tax incentives on TFP is more significant for private companies, compa-nies in central and western China and companies in areas with weak environmental controls. (3) There is a two-way causal relationship between tax incentives and TFP, mining companies with higher TFP re-ceive more tax incentives. Further analysis shows that tax incentives improve TFP through technological progress. This study provides Chinese firm-level evidence for the Porter hypothesis. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available