4.2 Article

Disparities in SARS-CoV-2 Testing for Hispanic/Latino Populations: An Analysis of State-Published Demographic Data

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 330-333

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001510

Keywords

COVID-19 diagnostic testing; pandemic response; racial and ethnic disparities; testing infrastructure

Funding

  1. Bloomberg Philanthropies
  2. Stavros Niarchos Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Racial and ethnic minorities in the United States have experienced disproportional impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reveals disparities in SARS-CoV-2 testing access, with Hispanic/Latino patients having significantly lower testing rates compared to non-Hispanic/Latino patients, indicating existing inequalities in testing among a population already at higher risk for infection and severe outcomes.
Racial and ethnic minorities in the United States have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, experiencing increased risk of infection, hospitalization, and death. In this study, we sought to examine race- and ethnicity-based differences in SARS-CoV-2 testing. We used publicly available US state dashboards to extract demographic data for COVID-19 cases and tests. Poisson regression models were used to model the effect of race and ethnicity on the number of SARS-CoV-2 tests performed per case. In total, just 8 states reported testing data by race and ethnicity. In regression models, race and ethnicity was a significant predictor of testing rate per case. In all states, Hispanic/Latino patients had a significantly lower testing rate than their non-Hispanic/Latino counterparts, with an incident rate ratio varying from 0.45 to 0.81, depending on the state and referent race category. These results suggest disparities in testing access among Hispanic/Latino individuals, who are already at a disproportionate risk for infection and severe outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available