4.3 Article

Focus on prevention: The public is more supportive of overdose prevention sites than they are of safe injection facilities

Journal

CRIMINOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 729-754

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12566

Keywords

labeling; opioids; public opinion; safe injection facility; survey experiment

Funding

  1. Center for Public Opinion
  2. Office of the Dean of Fine Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities
  3. Office of the Provost at the University of Massachusetts Lowell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research findings indicate that support for facilities providing a safe space for individuals to consume illicit drugs under medical supervision in the US is influenced by the label used, information provided, and national vs. local perspectives on the opioid epidemic. The public is more supportive of these facilities at the national level than at the local level, possibly due to Not In My Backyard concerns. Policy implications include using labels highlighting overdose prevention and discussing local facilities in the context of both national and local opioid epidemics to address NIMBY concerns.
Research Summary: Using a national survey experiment, we examined Americans' national and local-level support for facilities that provide a safer space for individuals to consume illicit drugs under the supervision of medical professionals. We determined whether support levels differed based on (1) the label used to refer to such facilities (safe injection facilities vs. overdose prevention sites), (2) whether beneficial information is provided about these facilities regarding either a crime control framework or a public health framework, or not. We also considered how national support differed from local-level support, and how national or local-level perceptions of the opioid epidemic influenced support. Policy Implications: We found that the label used to refer to these facilities was the most important factor influencing support levels. The public was also much more supportive of these facilities at the national level than at the local level, which suggests that support for these facilities is impacted by Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) concerns. Perceptions of an opioid epidemic either nationally or locally also influenced support levels. The major policy takeaways are that (1) proponents of these facilities should refer to them using labels that highlight overdose prevention (overdose prevention site), rather than safe drug use (safe injection facility) and (2) discussions about local facilities should be placed in the context of both the national and local opioid epidemic to help mitigate NIMBY concerns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available