4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Managing customer attractiveness: How low-leverage customers mobilize critical supplier resources

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100742

Keywords

Customer attractiveness; Resource mobilization; Innovation; Buyer-supplier relationships; Supplier involvement

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies how low-leverage customers manage to mobilize critical supplier resources by utilizing elements such as proactive technological competence, canvassing and continuous communication, supplier learning, market access, and relationship maintenance. The process of mobilizing suppliers for low-leverage customers is a long-term, resource-demanding effort that relies on a complex interplay of attractiveness elements.
Getting access to the specialized resources of suppliers for purposes of innovation can be difficult especially for customers that are small or in other ways represent a limited immediate potential in the eyes of suppliers. Such low-leverage customers must find other ways of making themselves attractive to coveted suppliers. In this paper, we study how customers with low leverage manage the process of mobilizing supplier resources critical for innovation. We present findings from a single case study of a buying firm and show how they use five elements to gradually become attractive in the eyes of a critical supplier: proactive technological competence, canvassing and continuous communication, supplier learning, market access, and relationship maintenance. The different elements play different roles during the process of mobilizing supplier resources. We show that mobilizing suppliers in the case of low-leverage customers is a long-term process in which a number of interrelated attractiveness elements are leveraged in a complex pattern. This process is highly resource-demanding and requires substantial dedication and effort from the customer organization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available