4.1 Article

A review of the applications of the JK size-dependent breakage model Part 2: Assessment of material strength and energy requirement in size reduction

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 36-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2016.09.009

Keywords

Breakage characterisation; Size effect; Modelling; Energy efficiency

Funding

  1. AMIRA P9N Program
  2. Anglo American
  3. Barrick Gold Corporation
  4. BHP Billiton
  5. Rio Tinto
  6. Teck
  7. JKTech
  8. ACARP [C20009, C23056]
  9. Australian Government Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism in the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate Program (APP)
  10. Newcrest Mining

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been 10 years since the JK size-dependent breakage model was developed (Shi and Kojovic, 2007). Part 2 of the review focuses on the model application to the assessment of material strength and energy requirements for size reduction. In the application for assessment of ore pre-weakening effects, two methods, the Axb based method and the tic) based method, are reviewed. The review also covers a coke strength index, the JKCSI, which unifies various rotating drum indices in different world standards into one single index, and a procedure to predict coal grindability, the HGI. In the application for energy assessment, the JK size-dependent breakage model is used to smooth the energy-size reduction relationship and predict crusher energy requirement, to explain the non-linear response of power station grinding mill capacity with the coal grindability index HGI, to develop a benchmark energy factor to assess energy efficiency for comminution equipment and circuits, and to estimate specific energy reduction resulting from the high voltage pulse pre-weakening effect. Many of these applications were possible only after the JK size-dependent breakage model became available. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available