4.7 Article

Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability

Journal

TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101868

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Green product innovation; Green process innovation; Green dynamic capability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71703171]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on surveying and analysis, this study finds that corporate social responsibility and green dynamic capability significantly promote green innovation, and green dynamic capability acts as a mediator between CSR and green innovation. These findings provide new guidance for improving green innovation for Chinese manufacturing companies.
Green innovation is a key aspect for organizations to realize sustainable development strategy in emerging markets. Based on the stakeholder theory, resource-based view, and dynamic capabilities theory, this study introduces corporate social responsibility (CSR) and green dynamic capability to investigate the mechanisms driving corporate green innovation. The green innovation is classified into two different aspects such as green product innovation and green process innovation. By surveying 424 manufacturing companies in China and analyzing with linear regression, we find that: (1) CSR practice significantly promotes green product innovation and green process innovation. (2) Green dynamic capability significantly promotes green product innovation and green process innovation. (3) Green dynamic capability function as a mediator between CSR and green innovation. Based on dynamic capabilities, this study reveals the impact mechanism of CSR on green innovation, expands the dynamic capabilities theory, and provides new guidance to improve green innovation for Chinese manufacturing companies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available