4.5 Article

From Traditional Research to Responsible Research: The Necessity of Scientific Freedom and Scientific Responsibility for Better Societies

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-062021-021303

Keywords

autobiography; phenomenon-inspired research; credibility crisis; research-practice gap; responsible research; scientific norms; scientific freedom; scientific responsibility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This passage describes the author's research journey, highlighting concerns about the research-practice gap and questionable research practices, as well as the emphasis on publishing in top journals. The importance of both scientific freedom and scientific responsibility is emphasized, along with the author's participation in the global responsible research movement.
My research journey spans a period of exciting new theories informing innovative practices in businesses and other organizations and a period littered with concerns about the research-practice gap, questionable research practices, and a strong emphasis on the number of publications in top journals for hiring and promotions. These recent developments led to the dilution of both scientific freedom and scientific responsibility in our scientific work. I offer my research journey to illustrate the importance of both, with the most recent endeavor in a global responsible research movement to produce useful and credible knowledge that will enable business and management practices to serve all stakeholders and to solve the world's most challenging problems. Emerging institutional changes in business schools, journals, associations, and accreditation agencies provide hope that scholars will soon find the conditions favorable for both freedom and responsibility to support their aspiration to pursue research that will contribute to better societies and meaningful careers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available