4.3 Article

Capitalism: what has gone wrong, what needs to change, and how it can be fixed

Journal

OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 637-649

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grab035

Keywords

capitalism; globalization; devolution; communities; markets; financial systems

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This issue of the Oxford Review of Economic Policy explores the problems with capitalism, the necessary changes, and potential fixes suggested by distinguished contributors. Three key ideas highlighted include revising the depiction of individuals in economics, advocating for decentralization of decision-making, and critiquing economic orthodoxy. These articles offer an inspiring assessment and reconceptualization of capitalism, providing practical ways to address its deficiencies while maintaining its benefits.
The distinguished contributors to this issue of the Oxford Review of Economic Policy were asked to address the question of what has gone wrong with capitalism, what needs to change, and how can it be fixed. The objective behind the solutions discussed in these articles is to retain as far as possible the benefits of globalization, technology, and market processes, while addressing sources of disaffection and discontent by prioritizing convergence in attainable levels of earned incomes and wellbeing within and across countries. Three key ideas run through the articles. The first is the inadequate depiction of the individual in conventional economics as a person preoccupied with consumption and leisure. The second is widespread support for greater devolution to local decision-taking, and an emphasis on the importance of cooperation in communities. The third is the critique of economic orthodoxy implied by the concept of radical uncertainty. Together, these articles provide an inspiring assessment and reconceptualization of capitalism, and offer practical ways of addressing its deficiencies while preserving its merits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available