4.5 Article

Economic policy uncertainty and earnings management: Evidence from Japan

Journal

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100925

Keywords

Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU); Earnings Management; Monitoring role; Main Bank; Analyst Coverage

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT) [18K01922, 21H04394]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K01922, 21H04394] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a negative relationship between economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and earnings management in Japan, with main banks and analysts playing a moderating role in this relationship. When EPU increases, managers have less incentive to reduce earnings management, and the presence of main banks and analysts further influences this dynamic.
We empirically examine the effects of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on earnings management in Japan. We find that EPU is negatively associated with earnings management, indicating that managers have incentive to reduce earnings management when EPU increases. We then examine the monitoring roles of various entities, focusing on the main bank that holds equity in their client firm. We find that the relationship between EPU and earnings management is less pronounced for firms with a main bank. The result is consistent with the view that the main bank's monitoring role works well in normal times, resulting in less room for management to improve earnings quality when EPU is high. We find a similar result when considering firms with and without analyst coverage. These results suggest a moderating role of main banks and analysts in the relationship between EPU and earnings management. Finally, we find that the effect of EPU differs depending on subcategories on policy uncertainty and the extent of each firm's exposure to that type of uncertainty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available