4.1 Article

The development of cognitive functioning indices in early childhood

Journal

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101098

Keywords

Growing Up in New Zealand; Longitudinal; Cognitive composite; Language; Preschool

Funding

  1. New Zealand Ministry of Social Development
  2. New Zealand Ministry of Health
  3. New Zealand Ministry of Education
  4. New Zealand Ministry of Justice
  5. New Zealand Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs
  6. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
  7. Ministry for Women
  8. Department of Corrections
  9. Social Policy Evaluation and Research Unit
  10. Te Puni Kokiri
  11. New Zealand Police
  12. Sport New Zealand
  13. Housing New Zealand Corporation
  14. Auckland UniServices Limited.
  15. NZ Health Research Council
  16. Statistics New Zealand
  17. Office of the Children's Commissioner
  18. Office of Ethnic Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that cognitive composite indices at 9 months, 2 years, and 4.5 years were differently related to cognitive outcomes at 8 years, with CCIs identified at 4.5 years having a better predictive power for future cognitive development.
A key difficulty in assessing cognitive development in early childhood lies in the necessity of using different measures for age groups over time. We report on the development of cognitive composite indices (CCIs) at 9 months, 2 years and 4.5 years in children enrolled in the Growing Up in New Zealand study. Data was collected from 6074 children comprising 21 age-adjusted cognitive outcomes. Factor analysis was performed, identifying one factor at 9 months and two factors at 2 years and 4.5 years, respectively. Only the CCIs identified at 4.5 years were significantly related to cognitive outcomes at 8 years. The scores identified in this study can potentially be used to observe rank order changes or movement of general cognitive abilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available