4.2 Article

Perceived emotion invalidation predicts daily affect and stressors

Journal

ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 214-228

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2022.2033973

Keywords

Emotion invalidation; ecological momentary assessment; daily stress; social context

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perceived emotion invalidation is associated with momentary affect and daily stress. People with higher levels of perceived emotion invalidation experience lower momentary positive affect and increased stress when daily negative affect is heightened.
Background and Objectives Perceived emotion invalidation is linked to the development or worsening of a variety of emotional and physical health conditions. However, prior studies are largely cross-sectional and whether there are day-to-day effects of generally feeling invalidated is unknown. Design We examined the relations between perceived emotion invalidation and momentary affect, average daily affect, and the experience of daily stressors among a sample of young adults using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Methods Participants (n = 86) completed measures of perceived emotion invalidation and emotional reactivity at baseline then completed one week of EMA including: (1) 7x/day reports of current affect and social context and (2) 1x/day index of experienced stressors and their intensity. Results Higher perceived emotion invalidation predicted lower momentary positive affect. Perceived invalidation also interacted with social context such that higher emotion invalidation predicted greater negative affect when participants were with non-close others (i.e., co-workers, acquaintances). Only participants with high perceived emotional invalidation experienced increased stress alongside heightened daily negative affect. Conclusions These results provide preliminary evidence that feeling emotionally invalidated may predict affective experiences, including how emotions are momentarily experienced and how life stressors are interpreted when they are later reflected on.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available