4.3 Article

What's in a name? A data-driven method to identify optimal psychotherapy classifications to advance treatment research on co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorders

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2001191

Keywords

Posttraumatic stress disorder; substance use disorder; dual diagnosis; treatment classification; co-occurring disorders

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA Clinical Trials Network) [0015]
  2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [R01AA025853]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify the optimal categorization methods for interventions targeting PTSD, SUD, or PTSD+SUD populations. Through literature search and expert survey, it was found that there are many overlapping categorizations. The most favorable categorization method appears to be trauma-focused and non-trauma focused. Revision of the language and terminology for treatment classification is necessary in this advancing field.
Background/Objective The present study leveraged the expertise of an international group of posttraumatic stress and substance use disorder (PTSD+SUD) intervention researchers to identify which methods of categorizing interventions which target SUD, PTSD, or PTSD+SUD for populations with both PTSD+SUD may be optimal for advancing future systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comparative effectiveness studies which strive to compare effects across a broad variety of psychotherapy types. Method A two-step process was used to evaluate the categorization terminology. First, we searched the literature for pre-existing categories of PTSD+SUD interventions from PTSD+SUD clinical trials, systematic and literature reviews. Then, we surveyed international trauma and substance use subject matter experts about their opinions on pre-existing intervention categorization and ideal categorization nomenclature. Results Mixed method analyses revealed that a proliferation of PTSD+SUD treatment research over the last twenty years brought with it an abundance of ways to characterize the treatments that have been evaluated. Results from our survey of experts (N = 27) revealed that interventions for PTSD+SUD can be classified in many ways that appear to overlap highly with one another. Many experts (11/27; 41%) selected the categories of 'trauma-focused and non-trauma focused' as an optimal way to distinguish treatment types. Although several experts reinforced this point during the subsequent meeting, it became clear that no method of categorizing treatments is without flaws. Conclusion One possible categorization (trauma-focused/non-trauma focused) was identified. Revised language and nomenclature for classification of PTSD+SUD treatments are needed in order to accommodate the needs of this advancing field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available