4.2 Article

A prospective, multisite implementation-efficacy trial of a collaborative prescriber-pharmacist model of care for Medication Assisted Treatment for Opioid Dependence: Protocol for the EPIC-MATOD study

Journal

RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 3394-3401

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.11.007

Keywords

Opioid agonist treatment; Community pharmacy; Collaborative care; Implementation-efficiency trial; Study protocol; MOUD

Funding

  1. Victorian Government
  2. NHMRC Research Fellowship [1163961]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The EPIC-MATOD study aims to evaluate the clinical and implementation outcomes of collaborative care for MATOD in a regional location in Victoria, Australia. The study will provide important information on the effectiveness, acceptability, and cost considerations of a collaborative care model in MATOD treatment.
Background: Medication Assisted Treatment for Opioid Dependence (MATOD) is clinically effective and cost effective, yet a lack of MATOD prescribers in the community limits access to this treatment in Australia. These shortages are often greatest in regional and rural areas. Objective(s): The Enhancing Pharmacist Involvement in Care (EPIC)-MATOD study will evaluate clinical and implementation outcomes among people with opioid dependence receiving MATOD through a collaborative pharmacist-prescriber model of care across multiple sites in a regional location (encompassing a mix of metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas) of Victoria, Australia. Methods and analysis: The EPIC-MATOD study is a prospective, multisite, implementation trial of collaborative MATOD care. Pharmacists and prescribers will be recruited through the local network of opioid pharmacotherapy providers. Patients will be recruited through participating healthcare providers. After induction into the collaborative care model, patients and healthcare professionals will be followed up over 6-(patients) and 12 months (pharmacists and prescribers) in a hybrid implementation-efficacy study, with outcomes mapped to the RE-AIM framework. The primary clinical efficacy endpoint is patient retention in treatment at 26 weeks. The primary implementation outcome is treatment capacity, based on prescriber time required to provide treatment through collaborative care compared with traditional care. Secondary clinical endpoints include attendance for dosing and clinical reviews, substance use, mental and physical health and overall well-being. Implementation costs, acceptability, and provider engagement in collaborative care will be used as secondary implementation outcome indicators. Time and costs associated with collaborative care, and health service utilisation, will also be estimated. Project impact: The study will provide important information on outcomes and acceptability of collaborative care for MATOD, as well as the cost and key considerations in delivering a collaborative model of care in Australia and other countries where similar treatment barriers exist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available