4.3 Article

Cognitive predictors of language abilities in primary school children: A cascaded developmental view

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0305000921000908

Keywords

processing speed; phonological skills; sentence processing; language development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the longitudinal relationship between children's domain-general cognitive constraints underlying phonological and sentence processing development in a big sample of typically developing children. The findings showed that non-linguistic processing speed had a concurrent effect on phonological skills, and phonology had a powerful effect on the child's sentence processing abilities concurrently and longitudinally. These findings support a cascaded cognitive view of language development and pose important challenges for evaluation and intervention strategies in childhood.
This study investigated the longitudinal relationship between children's domain-general cognitive constraints underlying phonological and sentence processing development in a big sample of typically developing children. 104 children were tested on non-linguistic processing speed, phonological skills (phonological short term memory, phonological knowledge, phonological working memory), and sentence processing abilities (sentence repetition and receptive grammar) in 1(st) grade (aged 6 to 6.5) and one year later. A cross-lagged structural equation model showed that non-linguistic processing speed was a concurrent predictor of phonological skills, and that phonology had a powerful effect on the child's sentence processing abilities concurrently and longitudinally, providing clear evidence for the role of domain-general processes in the developmental pathway of language. These findings support a cascaded cognitive view of language development and pose important challenges for evaluation and intervention strategies in childhood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available