4.2 Article

Neural network guided adjoint computations in dual weighted residual error estimation

Journal

SN APPLIED SCIENCES
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-022-04938-9

Keywords

Dual weighted residuals; A posteriori error estimation; Adjoint; Neural network; Deal.II; LibTorch

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [390833453]
  2. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work focuses on neural network guided goal-oriented a posteriori error estimation and adaptivity using the dual weighted residual method. The adjoint problem is solved using a feedforward neural network with two or three hidden layers to explore alternatives for reducing the numerical cost of solving the adjoint problem. The proposed algorithm is applicable to both linear and nonlinear stationary partial differential equations and goal functionals, and is substantiated with numerical experiments.
In this work, we are concerned with neural network guided goal-oriented a posteriori error estimation and adaptivity using the dual weighted residual method. The primal problem is solved using classical Galerkin finite elements. The adjoint problem is solved in strong form with a feedforward neural network using two or three hidden layers. The main objective of our approach is to explore alternatives for solving the adjoint problem with greater potential of a numerical cost reduction. The proposed algorithm is based on the general goal-oriented error estimation theorem including both linear and nonlinear stationary partial differential equations and goal functionals. Our developments are substantiated with some numerical experiments that include comparisons of neural network computed adjoints and classical finite element solutions of the adjoints. In the programming software, the open-source library deal.II is successfully coupled with LibTorch, the PyTorch C++ application programming interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available