4.3 Review

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for professional staff burnout: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of controlled trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 452-464

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022628

Keywords

Acceptance commitment therapy; ACT; burnout; review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the findings, interventions based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) can effectively reduce staff burnout, especially in various professional groups. However, the sample sizes were small and the interventions were not clearly defined, indicating a need for further large-scale studies to validate the results.
Background Staff working in people-oriented professions are vulnerable to burnout which is negatively associated with professional well-being and service-user care. Aim To investigate if interventions based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) are effective in reducing staff burnout. Method Systematic database and reference list searches were conducted resulting in the inclusion of 14 quantitative papers. A narrative synthesis, including extraction of individual effect sizes, was performed. Results All studies were controlled trials. The settings for ACT delivery were varied across health, social care, and public services. The ACT interventions demonstrated statistically significant effects in favour of ACT on the outcome measure subscales across the majority of studies (n = 9). Thirteen studies demonstrated an effect in favour of ACT in at least one outcome measure subscale. Positive aspects of work engagement varied according to a professional role. Conclusions The findings suggest that ACT-based interventions using a wide range of formats may have the potential to decrease burnout across a range of professional groups. However, samples were small in the studies reviewed and the interventions were not always defined. Further research would benefit from larger studies, incorporating process measures, with explicit protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available