4.2 Article

I did not know I was gay: sexual identity development and fluidity among married tongzhi in China

Journal

CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 1681-1694

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2021.1996631

Keywords

Tongzhi; gay and bisexual men; mixed-orientation marriage; sexual identity development; sexual fluidity; China

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analysed the life experiences of married tongzhi in mixed-orientation marriages in mainland China, finding that sexual identity development is influenced by historical, social, and cultural factors. Some tongzhi choose to maintain their heteronormative marriages while exploring and fulfilling their homoerotic desires due to the complexity of family life and social pressure.
This study aimed to analyse the life experiences of married tongzhi (defined here as men who are sexually attracted to men) in mixed-orientation marriages in mainland China. The study used a life course perspective to understand sexual identity development among tongzhi, born in the 1970s or thereabouts, in heterosexual marriage and rural China. The study focused on identifying the experiences of the 13 tongzhi participants. Using thematic analysis, we found sexual identity development was influenced by China's historical and social context and, in particular, internal (e.g. internalised heteronormativity), informational (e.g. Internet), and cultural (e.g. family-oriented) factors. Some tongzhi did not follow an identity development trajectory as out and proud since their identities were embedded in the complexity of family life and social pressure, the invisibility of gay circles, and normative social roles. They chose instead to maintain their heteronormative marriages, while seeking to explore and fulfil their homoerotic desires. Implications are discussed for epistemology, methodology and advocacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available