4.6 Article

The politics of post-developmentalist expertise: progressive movements, strategic localism, and urban governance in Seoul

Journal

URBAN GEOGRAPHY
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 134-152

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2021.2003587

Keywords

Urban expertise; social movements; postdevelopmentalism; neoliberal localism; community planning; South Korea

Funding

  1. Korean Studies Promotion Service of the Academy of Korean Studies [AKS-2018-OLU-2250001]
  2. Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea's Core University Program for Korean Studies
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [AKS-2018-OLU-2250001] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines progressive 'post-developmentalist' urban expertise in Seoul, South Korea, highlighting the potential risks these experts face in becoming a policy fix for reconfigured neoliberal and developmentalist agendas while promoting progressive policies through localism.
This article interrogates emergent forms of progressive 'post-developmentalist' urban expertise in Seoul, South Korea. We argue that a critical understanding of the nexus between political and civil society forged by pro-democratic activism is necessary to understand the politics of this expertise and the dilemmas it has encountered in creating alternatives to the legacy of developmentalist urbanization and promoting a more inclusive and emancipatory vision of urban politics. To illustrate our argument, we examine two cases: the first involves the incorporation of progressive labour, intellectual, and civil society activists to create urban-level institutions of social dialogue to upgrade labour relations. The second explores a community-empowerment movement, called Maulmandeulgi, initiated by local activists and later institutionalized in Seoul and other cities to establish a participatory model of community building. These cases detail how these actors have promoted progressive policies through engaging in strategic forms of localism, but also how their activity has risked becoming a policy fix for reconfigured neoliberal and developmentalist policy agendas. This risk is most apparent, we argue, as the political context at the national level has shifted between conservative and liberal administrations and the knowledge practices developed by these experts encouraged to move between places and across scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available