4.2 Review

Psychophysiological treatment of chronic tinnitus: A review

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 1236-1253

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2708

Keywords

CBT; neurofeedback; neuromodulation; review; tinnitus; treatment

Funding

  1. DFG [DFG BI 195/76-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Subjective chronic tinnitus refers to the continuous perception of sound without an acoustic source, leading to psychological issues. Although various treatment options exist, the effectiveness varies. Combination therapies targeting the intensity of tinnitus tone may provide more efficient outcomes.
Subjective chronic tinnitus consists of a more or less continuous perception of sound in the absence of a corresponding acoustic source, which can lead to various psychological problems like depression, anxiety, attentional deficits and sleep disturbances. The prevalence is 10%-15% of the general population. Various therapy and management options have been proposed, but outcomes vary, and no generally accepted cure exists. In this review, the coherence of the most frequently used aetiological models shall be evaluated, and the efficacy of several treatment options will be discussed. With respect to tinnitus treatments, we focus on controlled studies and meta-analyses. Although there are some therapies that outweigh placebo effects such as cognitive behavioural therapy, neurofeedback or neuromodulation techniques, they mainly target secondary symptoms and not the tinnitus tone itself. Furthermore, positive treatment effects only seem to last for a limited period of time. We conclude that long-lasting combination therapies such as neurofeedback of auditory cortex inhibitory EEG signatures, cognitive therapy and sound-tactile stimulation may provide more efficient outcomes if they target the intensity of the tinnitus tone itself and not only secondary psychological symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available