4.4 Article

Childbearing Biographies and Midlife Women's Health

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH
Volume 34, Issue 6-8, Pages 870-882

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/08982643211070136

Keywords

childbearing; motherhood; midlife health; latent class analysis

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [R01AG069251]
  2. Ohio State University Institute for Population Research through the NIH/NICHD [P2CHD058484]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a childbearing biography approach to examine the impact of various childbearing characteristics on midlife health. The results show that different childbearing biographies are strongly associated with physical health, but not mental health, with differences primarily explained by socioeconomic status.
Objectives We introduce a childbearing biography approach to show how multiple childbearing characteristics cluster in ways significant for midlife health. Methods We analyze the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79; N = 3992) using mixed-mode Latent Class Analysis with eight childbearing variables (e.g., age at first birth, parity, birth spacing, and mistimed births) to identify how childbearing biographies are associated with midlife health, adjusting for key covariates-including socioeconomic status (SES) and relationship history. Results We identify six childbearing biographies: (1) early compressed, (2) staggered, (3) extended high parity, (4) later, (5) married planned, and (6) childfree. Childbearing biographies are strongly associated with physical health but not mental health, with differences primarily explained by SES. Discussion Different childbearing biographies are related to physical health inequalities above what is demonstrated by the typical use of one or two childbearing measures, providing a new perspective into the growing health gap among aging midlife women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available