4.1 Article

How 9-month-old crawling infants profit from visual-manual rotations in a mental rotation task

Journal

INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101642

Keywords

Mental rotation; Manual exploration; Manual rotation; Infancy

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [222641018-SFB/TRR 135TP A7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of manual rotations and crawling experience is valuable for building up the internal spatial representation of an object, while object experience through haptic scans alone does not lead to discrimination ability.
Studies show that visual-manual object exploration influences spatial cognition, and specifically mental rotation performance in infancy. The current work with 9-month-old infants investigated which specific exploration procedures (related to crawling experience) support mental rotation performance. In two studies, we examined the effects of two different exploration procedures, manual rotation (Study 1) and haptic scanning (Study 2), on subsequent mental rotation performance. To this end, we constrained infants' exploration possibilities to only one of the respective procedures, and then tested mental rotation performance using a live experimental setup based on the task used by Moore and Johnson (2008). Results show that, after manual rotation experience with a target object, crawling infants were able to distinguish between exploration objects and their mirror objects, while non-crawling infants were not (Study 1). Infants who were given prior experience with objects through haptic scans (Study 2) did not discriminate between objects, regardless of their crawling experience. Results indicated that a combination of manual rotations and crawling experience are valuable for building up the internal spatial representation of an object.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available