4.2 Article

Mental health first aid USA implementation: Trainee reported quality and impact of training

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 1717-1735

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22750

Keywords

implementation; mental health first aid; mental health training; perceived impact

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the association between training implementation factors and Mental Health First Aid (MHFA)-targeted outcomes, finding that Quality, Impact, and Usefulness of the training had a positive influence on trainees. Trainees from marginalized backgrounds and lower education levels reported greater impact, and Quality and Impact predicted positive changes in MHFA-targeted constructs.
This study investigated the association of training implementation factors (Quality, Impact, Usefulness) with Mental Health First Aid (MHFA)-targeted outcomes (e.g., increased knowledge, confidence helping someone). Trainees who completed MHFA USA training in 2016 (N = 1003) were surveyed post training about its influence on their thoughts and behaviors, and about implementation factors. Some trainees completed 3- and 6-month follow-ups (N = 430, N = 276, respectively). Training Quality, Impact and Usefulness were rated highly. Differences in Quality and Impact across demographic groups were found; trainees from racially and ethnically marginalized backgrounds, and trainees with lower education levels, reported greater effect. Quality and Impact predicted positive changes in MHFA-targeted constructs such as self-efficacy, stigma and trainee perceived positive effect of MHFA strategies for those in crisis. Impact predicted positive change in mental health knowledge; this association strengthened over time. Results provide information about acceptability and perceived Impact of MHFA USA training and lead to recommendations for future evaluation and implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available