4.3 Article

Playing the long game: A multivariate multilevel non-linear growth curve model of long-term effects in a randomized trial of the Good Behavior Game

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 68-84

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.08.002

Keywords

Behavior management; Intervention; Randomized trial; Growth curve; Multilvariate multilevel modeling; Bayes factor

Funding

  1. Education Endowment Foundation
  2. National Institute for Health Research [14/52/38]
  3. Economic and Social Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the impact of the Good Behavior Game on children's developmental trajectories of disruptive behavior, concentration problems, and prosocial behavior, finding that the game reduced concentration problems over time and improved prosocial behavior among at-risk children. However, no clear intervention effects were found in relation to disruptive behavior.
This cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined the impact of the Good Behavior Game (GBG) on children's developmental trajectories of disruptive behavior, concentration problems, and prosocial behavior from middle childhood (ages 6-7 years) to early adolescence (ages 10-11 years). Seventy-seven schools in England were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Allocation was balanced by school size and the proportion of children eligible for free school meals. Children (N = 3084) ages 6-7 years at baseline were the target cohort. Outcome measures, assessed via the Teacher Observation of Child Adaptation Checklist, were taken prior to randomization (baseline - Time 1) and annually for the next 4 years (Time 2 to Time 5). During the 2-year main trial period (Time 1 to Time 3), teachers of this cohort in intervention schools implemented the GBG, whereas their counterparts in the control group continued their usual practice. A multivariate multilevel non-linear growth curve model indicated that the GBG reduced concentration problems over time. In addition, the model also revealed that the intervention improved prosocial behavior among at-risk children (e.g., those with elevated symptoms of conduct problems at Time 1, n = 485). No intervention effects were unequivocally found in relation to disruptive behavior. These findings are discussed in relation to the extant literature, strengths and limitations are noted, and practical and methodological implications are highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available