Provincialising Futures Literacy: A caution against codification

This paper reflects on the emergence of an international effort to codify and cultivate a new 'human capability': Futures Literacy. Futures Literacy is understood as the technical expertise to reflexively 'use the future' to perceive and inform actions in the present. Its advocates call for Futures Literacy to become a new 'universal literacy'. While the critical use of ideas of the future to inform action in the present is an educational practice with generative pedagogic and political possibilities, in this paper we show that codifying Futures Literacy in this way risks narrowing what constitutes 'rational' uses of the future, positioning a small technocratic elite as authorities in its practice and casting other uses of the future as forms of illiteracy. The paper proposes a different trajectory for 'Futures Literacy', in which it divests from assumptions of institutional authority and desires for universal codification, positions itself as one amongst many futures literacies and as allied with a broader repertoire of educational and social struggles over the future. In provincialising Futures Literacy in this way it will be better placed to creatively surface and grapple with the relations of power through which ideas of the future are brought into the present.

Automated summary

This paper discusses the emergence of Futures Literacy as a new international effort aimed at codifying and cultivating a new 'human capability'. It highlights the risks of narrowing what constitutes 'rational' uses of the future and positioning a small technocratic elite as authorities, while proposing a trajectory for Futures Literacy that emphasizes plurality and calls for creative engagement with power dynamics in bringing future ideas into the present.