4.1 Article Data Paper

Simulated dataset of corn response to nitrogen over thousands of fields and multiple years in Illinois

Journal

DATA IN BRIEF
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107753

Keywords

APSIM; Crop modeling; Maize; Nitrogen leaching; Nitrogen fertilizer

Funding

  1. NIFA Hatch/Multistate Hatch Grant
  2. Illinois Campus Cluster Program (ICCP)
  3. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen (N) fertilizer recommendations for corn in the US Midwest have been a long-standing puzzle, and the lack of long-term data is a major challenge. To address this, researchers have developed an analytical platform based on crop simulations, calibrated and validated with data from hundreds of trials. This dataset is valuable for N management, machine leaching, and environmental policy analysis.
Nitrogen (N) fertilizer recommendations for corn (Zea mays L.) in the US Midwest have been a puzzle for several decades, without agreement among stakeholders for which methodol-ogy is the best to balance environmental and economic out-comes. Part of the reason is the lack of long-term data of crop responses to N over multiple fields since trial data is often limited in the number of soils and years it can explore. To overcome this limitation, we designed an analytical plat-form based on crop simulations run over millions of farming scenarios over extensive geographies. The database was cal-ibrated and validated using data from more than four hun-dred trials in the region. This dataset can have an important role for research and education in N management, machine leaching, and environmental policy analysis. The calibration and validation procedure provides a framework for future gridded crop model studies. We describe dataset character-istics and provide thorough descriptions of the model setup. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available