4.3 Article

Adolescents Are More Likely to Help Others on Days They Take Risks and Crave Social Connections

Journal

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 1421-1432

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jora.12705

Keywords

risk-taking; prosocial behavior; daily diary

Funding

  1. Institute of Education Sciences [R305B140009]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development through the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [T32-HD07376]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01DA039923]
  4. Jacobs Foundation Early Career Research Fellowship [2018-1288-13]
  5. Winston Family Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the relationship between adolescents' risk-taking behaviors and prosocial behaviors on a daily basis, with a focus on how this connection varies depending on adolescents' levels of social craving. The findings suggest that when adolescents are highly motivated to connect with others, their risk-taking and prosocial tendencies tend to co-occur in daily life, independent of individual differences in sensation seeking.
This study examined how adolescents' risk-taking behaviors were related to their prosocial behaviors on a daily level and how this association differed depending on adolescents' daily and average levels of sensation seeking and social craving. Adolescents (N = 212; M-age = 15 years) completed daily diaries for 14 days. Adolescents were more likely to engage in prosocial behavior on days when they also took risks, but only when they also felt high levels of social craving. The daily link between risk-taking and prosocial behavior did not vary based on daily or individual differences in sensation seeking. Results suggest that when adolescents feel highly motivated to connect with others, their risk-taking and prosocial tendencies co-occur on a daily basis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available