4.5 Article

Street edge subdivision: Structuring ground floor interfaces to stimulate pedestrian visual engagement

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/23998083211068050

Keywords

Street edges; subdivision; ground floors; mobile eye-tracking; visual engagement; pedestrian

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/J500215/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically examines the impact of subdivision on visual engagement between pedestrians and ground floors of street edges using mobile eye-tracking technology. The results show that segments and micro-segments play a significant role in visual engagement, while plinths have no direct effect. These findings provide insights for design decision-makers to actively encourage pedestrian engagement with ground floors along street edges.
There have been numerous attempts to identify what makes the ground floor interfaces of street edges engaging for pedestrians. Their subdivision has often been highlighted as important, predominantly, in line with functions along their length. However, the effect of subdivision on street edge engagement is yet to be empirically tested. We use mobile eye-tracking to systematically examine where and for how long pedestrians visually engage ground floors in relation to their subdivision. We consider three scales of subdivision: morphologically defined plinths (different building ground floors), territorially defined segments (different areas of territorial ownership) and spatially defined micro-segments (different spaces separated by pillars and partitions). Results show that segments dominate ground floor visual engagement, with micro-segments also having a significant influence. Plinths were shown to have no direct effect upon such engagement. We subsequently use these findings to show how subdivision should be approached by design decision-makers when seeking to actively encourage pedestrian engagement with ground floors along street edges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available