Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 239-263Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12505
Keywords
austerity; conjoint surveys; fiscal policies; government debt; public opinion; survey experiments; trade-offs
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Public debt has become a politicised issue since the Great Recession. Research shows that citizens tend to be fiscally conservative, but also punish governments for implementing fiscal consolidation. However, experiments reveal that reducing debt is not a priority for citizens as it involves trade-offs in spending and taxes. Instead, the public leans towards supporting higher progressive taxes to fund more government spending.
Ever since the Great Recession, public debt has become politicised. Some research suggests that citizens are fiscally conservative, while other research shows that they punish governments for implementing fiscal consolidation. This begs the question of whether and how much citizens care about debt. We argue that debt is not a priority for citizens because reducing it involves spending and tax trade-offs. Using a split-sample experiment and a conjoint experiment in four European countries, we show that fiscal consolidation at the cost of spending cuts or taxes hikes is less popular than commonly assumed. Revenue-based consolidation is especially unpopular, but expenditure-based consolidation is also contested. Moreover, the public has clear fiscal policy priorities: People do not favour lower debt and taxes, but they support higher progressive taxes to pay for more government spending. The article furthers our understanding of public opinion on fiscal policies and the likely political consequences of austerity.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available