4.1 Article

Child-Parent Relationships and Older Adults' Health: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Between China and the United States

Journal

JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1622-1636

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0192513X211064866

Keywords

child-parent relationship; cross-cultural comparison; depressive symptoms; functional ability; cognitive function

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the associations between child-parent relationships and older adults' health in the United States and China. The results showed that child-parent relationships had nonsignificant associations with the health of older adults in the United States, while closer relationships were linked to better health outcomes in China.
This study compared the associations of child-parent relationships with older adults' multidimensional health in the United States and China. Two waves of data from the US Health and Retirement Study and its sister study in China (2012-2015) were used (2174 non-Hispanic [NH] White Americans and 4467 Chinese). Linear regression models were conducted for cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons. Results showed most child-parent relationships had nonsignificant associations with NH White Americans' health. In contrast, closer child-parent relationships were linked to fewer depressive symptoms and better cognitive function among Chinese. Co-residence was associated with poorer health among older Chinese. Over a 2-year period, living nearby was linked to poorer cognitive function among NH White Americans and fewer depressive symptoms among Chinese. Having weekly contact was predictive of better cognition among Chinese. This study revealed cross-cultural differences in the associations between child-parent relationships and older adults' health. Family relationships in accordance with Chinese culture could improve health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available