4.1 Article

Are non-contingent incentives more effective in motivating new behavior? Evidence from the field

Journal

GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 602-615

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2021.10.001

Keywords

Non-contingent incentives; Prosocial behavior; Sorting; Selection; Behavior change; Recycling

Categories

Funding

  1. ANID FONDECYT [1191745]
  2. Complex Engineering Systems Institute [ANID APOYO/BASAL AFB180003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that non-contingent economic incentives can effectively attract previously unengaged individuals to participate in activities, motivating people to adopt new behaviors more effectively than contingent incentives, especially for those who have never engaged in the activity before.
Organizations and policymakers increasingly rely on economic incentives to prompt participation in activities amongst those who were previously not engaged. We ran a field experiment with a recycling program to examine incentives' effectiveness to motivate new behavior-i.e., attract non-recyclers. We compared standard contingent incentives (payment contingent on recycling) to non-contingent incentives (upfront unconditional payment) of different sizes. A high contingent incentive was as effective as a non-contingent incentive (of any size) in attracting people to the program, but this masked differences in who participated. Across incentive sizes, people who had never recycled were 5.8 times more likely to begin recycling with the program when given a non-contingent incentive (20.2%) than when offered a contingent one (3.5%). A second experiment conceptually replicated this effect in an online job market, showing that non-contingent incentives were substantially more effective in attracting previous non-compliers. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available