4.3 Review

Developments in Qualitative Mindfulness Practice Research: a Pilot Scoping Review

Journal

MINDFULNESS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 17-36

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12671-021-01748-9

Keywords

Mindfulness practice; Mindfulness meditation; Qualitative; Scoping review

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current trends and practices in QMPR focus mainly on mindfulness-based interventions, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Research primarily examines the effectiveness and subjective experience of mindfulness practices, with data collection centered on participants and first-person data. Interpretative paradigms are the predominant analytical approach, and future research should include second- and third-person data, disclose details on mindfulness practice and data analysis, and intensify the application of critical and deconstructivist paradigms.
Objectives While scholars are increasingly emphasizing the potential of qualitative mindfulness practice research (QMPR) for advancing the understanding of mindfulness practice, there has been no significant empirical inquiry looking at actual trends and practices of QMPR. Consequently, it has been impossible to direct research practices toward under-researched areas and make methodical suggestions on how to approach them. The aim of the present study was to analyze current trends and practices in QMPR in order to address these areas of need. Methods Based on a scoping review, 229 qualitative studies published between 2000 and 2019 were analyzed in regard to their disciplinary backgrounds, research questions and intentions, type of mindfulness practice, target population, as well as practices of data collection and analysis. Results A strong focus of QMPR lies in the inquiry of mindfulness-based interventions, particularly mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and adaptations. Over 10% of the publications do not fully specify the mindfulness practice. The efficacy and subjective experience of mindfulness practices constitute the dominant research interests of QMPR. Data collection is highly concentrated on practice participants and first-person data. Interpretative paradigms are the predominant analytical approach within QMPR. QMPR studies have a strong proclivity toward emphasizing the positive effects of mindfulness practice. Nine percent of all articles considered for our study did not fully disclose their analytical procedure. Adversarial research groups and pluralistic qualitative research remain scarce. Conclusions Future QMPR should (i) include second- and third-person data, (ii) include dropouts and former mindfulness practitioners, (iii) fully disclose details on the mindfulness practice and data analysis, (iv) intensify the application of critical and deconstructivist paradigms, as well as pluralistic qualitative research, and (v) build adversarial research teams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available