4.3 Article

Exploration of diet, physical activity, health knowledge and the cardiometabolic profile of young adults with intellectual disability

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages 517-532

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jir.12917

Keywords

cardiometabolic risk; intellectual disability; knowledge; nutrition; physical activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that young adults with ID are at increased risk of obesity, engage in less physical activity than their peers, and have unhealthier diets. Knowledge about nutrition and physical activity seem to be important predictors of cardiometabolic risk in this population.
Background Young adults with intellectual disability (ID) are experiencing early mortality, and it is suggested that they are living with undiagnosed cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors (hereafter referred to as cardiometabolic). Methods We investigated the association between modifiable risk factors and cardiometabolic health profile in adults with ID aged 18-45 years through clinical evaluation of traditional cardiometabolic parameters, and assessment of physical activity levels, diet and associated health knowledge. Results We found that young adults with ID have an increased obesity (mean body mass index; ID group: 32.9 +/- 8.6 vs. control group: 26.2 +/- 5.5, P = 0.001), are engaging in less physical activity than the age-matched general population (total activity minutes per week; ID group: 172.2 +/- 148.9 vs. control group: 416.4 +/- 277.1, P < 0.001), and overall have unhealthier diets. Additionally, knowledge about nutrition and physical activity appears to be an important predictor of cardiometabolic risk in this population. If young people with ID are to improve their cardiometabolic health to reduce morbidity and early mortality, we need to further explore how to consistently apply health messaging to get lasting behavioural change in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available