4.4 Article

A meme-based research programme for management and organization studies

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 415-432

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12285

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Memes are suggested as cultural equivalents to genes, but the variable operationalization of the concept has hindered the development of a coherent field of memetic management and organization studies. There is an unrecognized dilemma regarding the ontological status of memes, as it is unclear whether they represent a real cultural gene-like entity or a gene metaphor.
Memes are proposed as cultural equivalents to genes, and meme-based research (memetics) has been undertaken to examine cultural aspects of management and organization studies (MOS). However, variable operationalization of the meme concept for a fragmented range of research topics has hampered the development of a coherent memetic MOS discipline. In particular, there is a largely unrecognized dilemma regarding the ontological status of the meme because it is unclear if the concept represents a real cultural gene-like entity or a gene metaphor. This paper provides a fresh view of the applications of the meme in MOS and the degree to which fundamental meme theory supports the memetic endeavour for the field. The paper aims to improve the accessibility of memetics to MOS scholars, whose interests involve cultural phenomena, by summarizing the heterogeneity in the extant research and providing the basis for the next stage of the memetic MOS research programme. A conceptualization is provided to show how applications of the meme can be made, either as a real gene-like entity or a gene metaphor. Ideas are provided for how research can be conducted that will contribute to MOS and support evaluation of the ontological status of the meme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available