4.7 Article

A hybrid assessment model for mineral resource availability potentials

Journal

RESOURCES POLICY
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102283

Keywords

Mineral resource availability; Mining technology; Geological constraint; Price elasticity

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71991482, 72074197, 71991480]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for National Universities of China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [2201710264]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201906410038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hybrid model proposed can comprehensively evaluate the availability of mineral resources, assessed by two indicators in a coordinate system. After evaluating 13 strategic minerals in China, it was found that gold, tin, and lead have significant potential in the future availability, while iron, aluminum, and copper have relatively lower potential. Zirconium, chromium, lithium, cobalt, tungsten, and nickel are technology-based strategic minerals, while molybdenum is market-oriented.
Traditional mineral resource availability assessment methods always have strong assumptions and limitations on application. Both the physical mechanism of the Hubbert model and the economic mechanism of the Hotelling model can evaluate only specific dimensions of the availability of mineral resources. Therefore, we propose a hybrid model that could explain mineral resource availability from geological factors to the metal market. In this model, mineral resource availability will be assessed by two indicators in a coordinate system. One is the marginal effect of mining technology, which is calculated by the Cobb-Douglas production function. Another is the price elasticity ratio of reserve and production. Meanwhile, we apply this model to assess 13 kinds of strategic minerals in China. Among them, the availability potential of gold, tin and lead is large in the future, while that of iron, aluminum and copper is relatively small. In addition, zirconium, chromium, lithium, cobalt, tungsten and nickel are technology-based strategic minerals, while molybdenum is a market-oriented strategic mineral. Moreover, we put forward the classified management policy based on empirical results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available