4.4 Article

Social Bots and the Spread of Disinformation in Social Media: The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 1238-1253

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12554

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing business and society, but also posing challenges with the presence of harmful social bots. By utilizing text mining and machine learning techniques, researchers have investigated the role of social bots in spreading disinformation on social media through experimental research. Organizations can utilize these findings for early detection of harmful social bots and preventing misinformation spread.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is creating a revolution in business and society at large, as well as challenges for organizations. AI-powered social bots can sense, think and act on social media platforms in ways similar to humans. The challenge is that social bots can perform many harmful actions, such as providing wrong information to people, escalating arguments, perpetrating scams and exploiting the stock market. As such, an understanding of different kinds of social bots and their authors' intentions is vital from the management perspective. Drawing from the actor-network theory (ANT), this study investigates human and non-human actors' roles in social media, particularly Twitter. We use text mining and machine learning techniques, and after applying different pre-processing techniques, we applied the bag of words model to a dataset of 30,000 English-language tweets. The present research is among the few studies to use a theory-based focus to look, through experimental research, at the role of social bots and the spread of disinformation in social media. Firms can use our tool for the early detection of harmful social bots before they can spread misinformation on social media about their organizations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available