4.2 Article

Measuring Memory Lapses and Their Impact on Daily Life: Results From Two Daily Diary Studies

Journal

ASSESSMENT
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 1454-1466

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10731911221077962

Keywords

memory lapses; everyday memory; prospective memory; retrospective memory; daily assessment; coordinated analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the frequency and impact of memory lapses using daily diary methods. The findings revealed that memory lapses occurred on more than one-third of the assessment days, with retrospective lapses being reported more frequently than prospective lapses. However, both types of memory lapses had similar impacts on daily life. The Daily Memory Lapses Checklist provides a flexible measure for understanding daily experiences of cognitive functioning.
Memory lapses (e.g., forgetting a medication) are common for most people, yet past methods of assessment relied upon retrospective reports from long recall windows. Recently, researchers have incorporated daily diary methods to capture memory lapse frequency closer to the experience in real-world environments. This study describes the utility of the Daily Memory Lapses Checklist using data from two 14-day diary studies (Combined Sample = 467; 66% women). Frequency and impact (i.e., irritation and interference) of prospective and retrospective memory lapses were assessed at both individual- and daily levels. Across studies, memory lapses occurred on more than one-third of assessment days. Retrospective lapses were reported more frequently than prospective; however, both lapses had a similar impact. The Daily Memory Lapses Checklist represents a flexible measure that separates the occurrence of a memory lapse from its impact on daily life: metrics that will enhance our understanding of daily experiences of cognitive functioning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available