4.3 Article

Comparing characteristics and outcomes of different opioid agonist treatment modalities among opioid-dependent federal men correctional populations in Canada

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103480

Keywords

Opioids agonist treatment; Methadone; Buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone (R)); Corrections; Canada; Release

Funding

  1. Hugh Green Foundation Chair in Addiction Research, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [SAF94814]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the characteristics and outcomes of men in Canadian federal correctional institutions, finding that individuals switching OAT modalities are a more complex group needing additional supports, and a high proportion of individuals in the OAT groups have their release revoked, mostly due to their substance use.
Background: Limited evidence exists in Canada on outcomes related to Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) and/or differences between OAT modalities among persons in correctional institutions. This study addresses this knowledge gap by examining key characteristics and outcomes of men in Canadian federal correctional institutions across treatment modalities. Methods: A retrospective cohort of men incarcerated in federal correctional institutions (N = 2833) were classified into four groups - three OAT participant groups: prescribed methadone (M-OAT), prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone (R); S-OAT) and those who switched between the two OAT modalities at least once (X-OAT). The fourth group was a non-treatment comparison group (Non-OAT). Two-thirds of study participants were released and examined for post-release outcomes. Descriptive statistics and multi-variate Cox proportional hazards regression were used. Results: The X-OAT group was more likely than the other study groups to have positive urinalysis tests, disciplinary charges, or institutional security or behavioral incidents. Survival analysis indicated that the X-OAT had an adjusted hazard of a return to custody that was 57% greater than the other groups. Conclusions: This study indicates that individuals switching OAT modalities are a more complex group needing additional supports, especially for community reintegration. Although few of the returns to custody were due to new offences, a third of participants in the OAT groups had their release revoked, indicating a high need population mostly due to their substance use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available