4.5 Article

Alcohol Cognitive Bias Modification training for problem drinkers over the web

Journal

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 21-26

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.08.010

Keywords

Attentional bias; Approach bias; Cognitive bias modification; Alcohol; E-health

Funding

  1. STW-Cognition (applied technical sciences) [MSW.7353]
  2. Dutch National Science Foundation, N.W.O. [VICI 453-08-001]
  3. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [RES-000-22-0314]
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-23-1269]
  5. ESRC [RES-000-23-1269] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-23-1269] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following successful outcomes of cognitive bias modification (CBM) programs for alcoholism in clinical and community samples, the present study investigated whether different varieties of CBM (attention control training and approach-bias re-training) could be delivered successfully in a fully automated web-based way and whether these interventions would help self-selected problem drinkers to reduce their drinking. Participants were recruited through online advertising, which resulted in 697 interested participants, of whom 615 were screened in. Of the 314 who initiated training, 136 completed a pretest, four sessions of computerized training and a posttest. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions (attention control or one of three varieties of approach-bias re-training) or a sham-training control condition. The general pattern of findings was that participants in all conditions (including participants in the control-training condition) reduced their drinking. It is suggested that integrating CBM with online cognitive and motivational interventions could improve results. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available